Application of the TV-GARCH model in estimating the exchange rate volatility in Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD students, Department of Economics, Aligudarz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aligudarz, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Arak University, Visiting Professor Department of Economics in Islamic Azad University Aligudarz Branch

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, University of Ayatollah Borujerdi

Abstract

Introduction: Exchange rate volatility can affect the performance of macroeconomics, especially the competitiveness of countries. Real exchange rate volatility indicates the instability and uncertainty in relative prices. It creates an unstable and uncertain environment in the economy. Therefore, the study of the impacts of exchange rate volatility has a great importance. In order to study its effect, it is necessary to first measure the volatility as a quantitative variable. For this purpose, various econometric methods have been introduced, such as the Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heterogeneity (GARCH). In general, choosing an accurate method for modeling and predicting volatility in economic variables has always been one of the goals of many studies. If volatility is not calculated accurately, misleading experimental results are obtained. After the critique of Lucas (1976), it became important to pay attention to models with time variable coefficients. One of the implications of Lucas' critique is that the estimated coefficients to express the relationship between the variables cannot be stable. This issue is especially important in developing countries where the process of changing economic structures is faster and wider. So, the purpose of this study is to introduce a time-varying GARCH model to calculate the exchange rate volatility in Iran.
Methodology: The research was based on the monthly exchange rate data (US dollar to Rial) in the market during 1985-2019. The data were extracted from the online database of the Central Bank of Iran. For the calculation of the volatility in economic variables, the tendency to use GARCH models is greater than other models. Among the GARCH models, GARCH (1,1) is the most popular. However, according to Stock and Watson (2008), because of structural breaks, the most important problems of GARCH models is that they cannot make accurate predictions over the time. This gave more attention to time-varying parameter models and Markov chain Monte Carlo models. In these models, estimation coefficients can change over time. Also, the study of the financial time series shows that most of them are influenced by domestic or foreign political, economic and social events, such as financial crisis, oil shocks, war, political instability and sudden changes in foreign exchange policies. The effects of these events sometimes remain in the market for a long time. Therefore, it can be said that models with fixed coefficients do not have the ability to formulate the behavior of exchange rates, especially in the long-term horizons. Thus, it is necessary to use time-varying models with variable coefficients over time. In this study, in addition to conventional GARCH models, a time varying GARCH (TVGARCH) is introduced to show the different behaviors of exchange rate over time. For this purpose, the TVP-SVM model based on the model introduced by Koopman and Hol Uspensky (2002) is used to examine the exchange rate volatility in Iran. In this study, following Chan (2017), the Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) approach is used to estimate fixed coefficients and variable coefficients over time. Also, the Bayesian approach and the Markov chain algorithm have been used to simulate the prior distribution if common functions.
Results and Discussion: In order to calculate exchange rate volatility using GARCH family models, the ARIMA model was first estimated using the Box-Jenkins method, and then the GARCH model was estimated on the ARIMA model residuals.
The results of the Zivot- Andrews unit root test showed that the exchange rate has a non-stationary level. The test also confirmed the existence of a structural break in the time series. The estimated values ​​for the coefficients of the GARCH and EGARCH models showed that the conditional volatility in this period is positively affected by the amount of variance in the previous period. Also, more than 95% of the variance of each period is transferred to the next period. The estimated coefficients also showed that there is a significant difference between the effect of good and bad news on exchange rate volatility; good news (i.e., the news that increases the dollar price) compared to bad news (i.e., the news that decreases the dollar price) have greater impacts.
As the results of the TVGARCH model showed, the volatility average was 0.358 with 90% confidence, and the logarithm of the variance index was, thus, in the range of -0.79 to 1.557. In the calculations, ϕ represented the effect of the variance of the previous period on the variance of the current period. It was positive and indicated that approximately 96% of the volatility created in each period was transferred to the next period. Also, α represented the relationship between the exchange rate volatility and the exchange rate in each period. The average obtained for this coefficient was positive, implying that, in periods when the exchange rate increases, the exchange rate volatility is higher.
According to the comparisons performed on the sample and based on the MSE criterion, TVGARCH is the most accurate, and GARCH is more accurate than EGARCH. Moreover, according to the QLIKE criterion, the TVGARCH model is more powerful than the other two conventional models, and the EGARCH model has a higher accuracy than GARCH.
Conclusion: According to the results, the TV-GARCH model is more powerful than conventional GARCH models. This indicates structural failure and changes in the behavior of the exchange rate in the Iranian economy. It has caused the relationship between the components of the conditional variance to change over time. In other words, there are different values ​​for GARCH coefficients in different periods. According to the results of the TV-GARCH model, the relationship between exchange rate and volatility has been varied over the time, which implies changes in the behavior and motivation of economic agents and the structural changes in the Iranian economy. According to the results, the use of the TV-GARCH model instead of the conventional GARCH with fixed coefficients is recommended.

Keywords


Abbate, A. & Marcellino, M. (2017). "Point, Interval and Density Forecasts of Exchange Rates with Time Varying Parameter Models". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 181(1): 155-179.
Abounoori, E. & Zabol, M. (2018). "Comparing GARCH Models by Introducing Fuzzy Asymmetric Realized GARCH". Journal of Econometric Modelling 3(4): 37-58. (In Persian)
Akbari, J. Bakhtiari, S. Sameti, M. & Ranjbar, H. (2017). "Surveying the Monetary Shocks Impact on the Income-Expenditure Relationship in the Iran's Government with the Approach of TVPFAVAR". Economic Modeling 10(36): 53-73. (In Persian)
Ali, A. Muhammad Kashif, A. & Muhammad, A. (2011). "Estimation and Forecast of the Models for Stock Market Performance of the Oil & Gas Companies in Pakistan". Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS) 31(2): 345-363.
Asseery, A. & Peel, D. A. (1991). "The Effects of Exchange Rate Volatility on Exports: Some New Estimates". Economic Letter 37(2): 173-177.
Bafandeh Imandoust, S. Fahimifard, S. & Shirzady, S. (2010). "Iran's Exchange Rate Forecasting Using ANFIS, NNARX & ARIMA Models (2002-2008)". Monetary & Financial Economics 16(28): 176-192. (In Persian)
Basirat, M. Nasirpur, A. & Jorjorzadeh, A. (2014). "The Impacts of Exchange Rate Volatility on the Economic Growth with According to the Level of Financial Market Development". Journal of Financial Economics 9(30): 141-156.
Bollerslev, T. (1986). "Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity". Journal of Econometrics 31: 307-327.
Chan, J. C.C. & Strachan, R. (2014). "The Zero Lower Bound: Implications for Modelling the Interest Rate. Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis". Working Paper Series No. 42-14.
Chan, J.C.C. (2015). "The Stochastic Volatility in Mean Model with Time-Varying Parameters: An Application to Inflation Modeling". CAMA Working Paper No. 7/2015.
Chan, J.C.C. (2017). "The Stochastic Volatility in Mean Model with Time-Varying Parameters: An Application to Inflation Modeling". Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 35(1): 17-28.
Chinn, M.D. & Meese, R.A. (1995). "Banking on Currency Forecasts: How Predictable is Change in Money?". Journal of International Economics 38(1-2): 161-178.
Cogley, T. Primiceri, G. & Sargent, T. (2010). "Inflation-Gap Persistence in the U.S.". American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2: 43-69.
Dias, G. F. (2017). "The Time-Varying GARCH-in-Mean Model". Economics Letters 157: 129-132.
Elmi, Z. Aboonouri, E. Rasekhi, S. & Shahrazi, M. (2014). "The Influence of Volatility Structural Changes on Shock Transmission and Volatility Spillover between Gold and Stock Markets in Iran". Economic Modeling 8(26): 57-73. (In Persian)
Engle, R. F. & Rangel, J. G. (2008). "The Spline-GARCH Model for Low-Frequency Volatility and its Global Macroeconomic Causes". Review of Financial Studies 21: 1187-1222.
Engle, R.F. (1982). "Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation". Econometrica 50(4): 987-1007.
Fathizadeh, H. Piraei, K. & Asadi, E. (2017). "The Impacts of Iranian Trade Partners on the Inflation Uncertainty in Iran: GARCH Models Approaches". Applied Economics 9(29): 77-94. (In Persian)
Hakkio, C.S. (1984). "Exchange Rate Volatility and Federal Reserve Policy". Economic Review 69: 18-31.
Hauzenberger, N. & Huber, F. (2020). "Model Instability in Predictive Exchange Rate Regressions". Journal of Forecasting 39(2): 168-186.
Koopman, S. J. & Hol Uspensky, E. (2002). "The Stochastic Volatility in Mean Model: Empirical Evidence from International Stock Markets". Journal of Applied Econometrics 17(6): 667-689.
Lee, S. Nguyen, L. & Sy, M. (2017). "Comparative Study of Volatility Forecasting Models: the Case of Malaysia, Indonesia, Hong Kong and Japan Stock Markets". Economics World 23: 299-310.
Longmore, R. & Robinson, W. (2004). "Modelling and Forecasting Exchange Rate Dynamics: an Application of Asymmetric Volatility Models". Bank Jam Working Pap WP2004/03.
Lucas, R. J. (1976). "Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique". Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 1(1): 19-46.
Mandelbrot, B. (1963). "The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices". Journal of Business 36: 394-419.
McMillan, D. & Thupayagale, P. (2010). "Evaluating Stock Index Return Value-at-Risk Estimates in South Africa: Comparative Evidence for Symmetric, Asymmetric and Long Memory GARCH Models". Journal of Emerging Market Finance 9(3): 325-345.
Meese, R.A. & Rogoff, K. (1983). "Empirical Exchange Rate Models of the Seventies: Do They Fit Out of Sample?". Journal of International Economics 14(1): 3-24.
Miletic, S. (2015). "Modeling and Forecasting Exchange Rate Volatility: Comparison Between EEC and Developed Countries". Industrija 43: 7-24.
Najarzade, R. Agheli, L. & Khorasani, E. (2019). "The Effect of Financial Market Variables and Macroeconomic Variables on Exchange Rate Returns of Iran and Major Trading Partners (1990 to 2015)". Economic Modeling 13(47): 55-76. (In Persian)
Nelson, D. B. (1991). "Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach". Econometrica 59: 347-370.
Rostami, M. Makiyan, S. & Roozegar, R. (2021). "Stock Return Volatility using Bayesian Symmetric and Asymmetric GARCH". The Journal of Economic Policy 12(24): 171-206. (In Persian)
Shahbazi, K. & Asadi, F. (2014). "Impact of Exchange Rate on Imports of Medicines and Medical Equipment". The Journal of Economic Policy 6(11): 35-54. (In Persian)
Stock, J. H. & Watson, M. W. (2008). "Heteroskedasticity-Robust Standard Errors for Fixed Effects Panel Data Regression". Econometrica 76(1): 155-174.
Waheed, M. Alam, T. & Ghauri, S. P. (2006). "Structural Breaks and Unit Root: Evidence from Pakistani Macroeconomic Time Series". MPRA Paper 1797, University Library of Munich, Germany.
Zivot, E. & Andrews, D. (1992). "Further Evidence of Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock and Unit Root Hypothesis". Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10: 251-270.