Examining government revenue shocks and their effects on macroeconomic variables Using DSGE Model

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD. Candidate in Economics, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

10.22034/epj.2025.21084.2553

Abstract

Abstract
The present study investigates government revenue shocks including oil revenues, tax revenues, and revenues arising from an increase in the exchange rate (exchange-rate shock) as well as their effects on macroeconomic variables. To this end, a Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) model was developed for the Iranian economy under open-economy conditions using the data covering the period from 1989 to 2021. According to the simulation results, an increase in the exchange rate raises the marginal costs of domestic firms, thus reducing the imports of intermediate, capital, and consumer goods as compared to their steady-state paths. The output also exhibits a decreasing and subsequently increasing pattern as compared to the steady-state path. A positive oil shock, through its effects on the monetary base and government expenditures, increases aggregate demand and inflation, which, in turn, leads to an increase in non-oil output as compared to its steady-state path. Following a positive oil shock, non-oil exports decrease, while imports of all the three categories of goods, namely intermediate, capital, and consumer goods, increase.. A positive tax shock reduces households’ disposable income, leading to a decline in household consumption of both domestic and imported goods. Consequently, aggregate demand decreases, and output follows a downward trajectory. Furthermore, all the three shocks result in a reduction in the government budget deficit and government debt. According to the results obtained from the welfare loss function, the exchange-rate shock generates the greatest welfare loss compared to oil-revenue and tax shocks.
 
Extended Abstract
 
Purpose: Statistical and historical evidence shows that the Iranian government utilizes three main channels to increase its resources. These three scenarios are taxes, oil revenues, and an exchange rate increase. Each of the financing scenarios affects the nominal and real variables of the economy through different channels. The purpose of this study is to examine government revenue shocks and their impacts on macroeconomic variables.
 
Methodology: This study utilizes the stochastic dynamic general equilibrium method to analyze the effects of shocks originating from three government income sources. Furthermore, the losses resulting from these shocks are compared. The model considers six agents including household, intermediate goods-producing firms, the trade sector in both non-oil exports and imports, the oil sector, government, and the central bank. The data used in the simulation, covering the period from 1989 to 2022, were obtained from the Time Series Information Database of CBI and the Data and Statistical Information of the Statistical Center of Iran. The parameters have been calibrated by previous studies and by considering geometric means of variables.
 
Findings and Discussion: Macroeconomic effects of an exchange rate shock: The initial consequence of the exchange rate increase is a decrease in the import of consumption goods, investment goods, and intermediate inputs. The reduction in the import of these goods is not uniform. The decrease in the import of intermediate goods and intermediate inputs is less pronounced than that of consumption goods. This is because, when the exchange rate increases, the production sector cannot immediately and fully reduce its orders for intermediate inputs. As time passes and the price of domestic goods rises, leading to an increase in consumer prices, the value of all types of imported goods tends to be stabilized. Additionally, the rise in the relative price of imported goods contributes to an increase in inflation from its equilibrium level. Also, the positive exchange rate shock increases the competitiveness of export goods by reducing the export price index and leads to an increase in non-oil exports from the equilibrium level. Production also decreased initially due to the increase in the marginal cost of firms. But over time, it increased due to the increasing demand of domestic and foreign households for domestic goods. The foreign exchange reserves of the Central Bank initially increased by 4%, which resulted in an expansion of the monetary base. However, over time, the monetary base gradually declines and returns to its equilibrium level. In addition, this shock leads to a reduction in the government budget deficit and a reduction in government debts. 
Macroeconomic effects of oil revenue shock: As oil revenues increase, with a significant portion of this income being sold to the central bank, the foreign reserves of the central bank initially rise by 3% from its equilibrium level. An increase in the net foreign assets of the Central Bank leads to an increase in the monetary base. Additionally, an increase in the net foreign assets of the central bank also results in a reduction in the nominal exchange rate. Inflation also increases due to an increase in the monetary base, and the real exchange rate decreases due to thea decrease in the nominal exchange rate. The decrease in the real exchange rate also leads to a decrease in non-oil exports and an increase in imports. Therefore, the import of consumption goods, investment goods, and intermediate inputs increases.
 The positive effect of the oil shock on the supply side causes prices to rise and creates an incentive to increase production in the non-oil sector, so intermediate goods-producing firms tend to use more labor and capital. Due to a limited labor force, firms offer higher wages, leading to increases in both wages and capital rents. Because the government budget is dependent on oil, an increase in oil revenues reduces the government budget deficit. Additionally, a positive oil shock leads to the increase of the government's investment expenditure. The investment increases due to the increase in the government's investment expenditure and the increase in imports.
Macroeconomic effects of tax shock: An increase in taxes results in a reduction in household income, leading to decreased consumption of both domestic and imported goods. This, in turn, causes a decline in aggregate demand, resulting in lower output and employment. Reducing production means reducing the utilization of production factors, including capital, labor, and intermediate inputs. Also, with a decrease in production, inflation increases, which leads to a decrease in the real rental rate of capital. The increase in taxes has resulted in reduced motivation and labor supply, leading to a 0.15% increase in wages. This shock will also boost government revenues, reduce the budget deficit, and decrease government debts. In response to the increase in revenues, the government raises its consumption expenditures.
 
Conclusions and Policy Implications: Based on the model's results and the more volatile effects of the exchange rate on macro variables, it is advisable for the government to refrain from implementing policies that increase the exchange rate in pursuit of more revenues and decrease the budget deficit.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Ahiabor, G., & Amoah, A. (2019). Examining the Effect of Real Effective Exchange Rate Volatility on Economic Growth: Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, 20(1), 1-14.
Akbarpoor Roshan, N. (2018). The Effectivity of Government Fiscal Instruments on Macroeconomic Variables in Iran: An Application of Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model (DSGE). PhD Dissertation, The University of Mazandaran. [In Persian].
Akighir, D. T. (2023). Foreign Exchange Market Pressure, Exchange Rate and Trade Balance in Nigeria: Is There Evidence of the J-Curve Effect?. Journal of Developing Economies (JDE), 8(2), 340-363.
Bakhtiari, A. (2023). Investigating the Impact of the Growth of the Components of Liquidity Resources on the Real and Nominal Values of Iran's Economy, Evidences of the Random Dynamic General Composition Model. PhD Dissertation, Shahid Beheshti University. [In Persian].
Balli, E., Çatık, A. N., & Nugent, J. B. (2021). Time-varying Impact of Oil Shocks on Trade Balances: Evidence using the TVP-VAR Model. Energy, 217, 119377. ‏ ‏
Bamaiyi, G. (2024). Effect of Oil Price Shocks on Selected Macroeconomic Variables in Nigeria (1990-2021). International Journal of Development and Economic Sustainability, 12(1), 12-25. ‏
Barro, R.J., & Sala-i-Martin, X., (1992). Public Finance in Models of Economic Growth. Review of Economic Studies, 59(4), 645–661.
Ben-Taher, H. A. (2024). The Macroeconomic Effect of Oil Sector Crisis in Libya. Studies in Business and Economics, 27(1), 22-43.‏
Bernanke, B.S., & Gertler, M. (1995). Inside the Black Box: the Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 27–48.
Bhattarai, K., & Trzeciakiewicz, D. (2017). Macroeconomic Impacts of Fiscal Policy Shocks in the UK A DSGE Analysis, Economic Modelling, 61(C): 321-338.
Bofah, K. (2003). The Impact of Tax on Investment and Business Decisions. Int. Res. J. Fin. Eco, 63, 99-116.‏
Boroumand, S. Mohamadi, T. Memar Nejad, A. & Baghfalaki, A. (2020). The Effect of External Shocks on Macroeconomic Variables for the Iranian Economy in the form of New Keynesian DSGE Model. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research and Policies, 28(93), 93-121.
Calvo, G. A. (1983). Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12, 383-398.
Dar, A., Amirkhalkhali, S., (2002). Government Size, Factor Accumulation, and Economic Growth: Evidence from OECD Countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 24, 679–692.
Dargahi, H., & Hadian, M. (2016). Evaluation of Fiscal and Monetary Shocks with Emphasis on the Interactions of Banking System Balance Sheet and the Real Sector of Iran's Economy: A DSGE Approach. Quarterly Journal of Applied Theories of Economics, 3(1), 1-28.‏ [In Persian].
Dong, B., Ma, X., Wang, N., & Wei, W. (2020). Impacts of Exchange Rate Volatility and International Oil Price Shock on China's Regional Economy: A dynamic CGE Analysis. Energy Economics, 86, 103762.‏
Ehikioya, B. I. (2019). The Impact of Exchange Rate Volatility on the Nigerian Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Economics & Management, 37, s-45.
Emami, K., & Adibpour, M. (2012). Oil Income Shocks and Economic Growth in Iran. Economic Modelling, 29(5), 1774-1779.
Eze, N. B., Nnenna, A. A., & Ifeanyi, I. M. (2024). Exchange Rate and National Output Performances: The Implication on Nigeria’s Economy. Global Journal of Social Sciences, 23(1), 25-42.‏
Faraji Dizaji, S. (2014). The Effects of Oil Shocks on Government Expenditures and Government. Economic Modelling, 40, 299-313.
Farzin Vash A, Ehsani M A, Keshavarz H. (2015). The Impact of Financial Shocks on the Labour Market Fluctuations in a Barter Economy. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research and Policies, 22(72), 49-76. [In Persian].
Ghafari, H., Noori, M., & Younessi, A. (2016). Evaluating the Efficiency of the Tax System and its Impact on Economic Growth. Macroeconomics Research Letter, 11(21): 155-177. [In Persian].
Ghaffari, H., Jalouli, M., & Ashtiani, A. C. (2014). Investigation and Forecasting of the Effects of Exchange Rate Increase on Economic Growth of Major Economic Sectors of Iran, Applied Economics Studies Iran, 8(8),‏ 91-113. [In Persian].
Hadian, M., & Dargahi, H. (2018). The Role of Macroprudential Policies in the Financial Stability of the Iranian Economy, Iranian Economic Research Quarterly, 22(73), 45-82. [In Persian].
Hashemi Dizaj, A. (2009). Financial and Monetary Policies (Vol.2). Tehran, Academic Jihad Publications. [In Persian].
Huchet-Bourdon, M., & Korinek, J. (2011). To What Extent Do Exchange Rates and Their Volatility Affect Trade? OECD Trade Policy Working Papers, 10(119), 1-44.
Jafari Samimi, A., Balounejad Nouri. R., & Tranchian, A M. (2016). An Investigation of the Impact of Oil Revenue Shocks on Output and Inflation under Conditions of Price and Wage Stickines, Quarterly Energy Economics Review, 12(48): 1-32. [In Persian].
Jafari Samimi, A., Montazeri Shoorekchali, J., & Khazaei A. (2016). Impact of Methods of Financing Government Expenditures on Economic Growth in Iran (Emphasizing the Oil and Tax Revenues). The Journal of Planning and Budgeting. 21(1), 3-21. [In Persian].
Landon, S., & Smith, C. E. (2006). Exchange Rates and Investment Good Prices: A cross-industry Comparison. Journal of International Money and Finance, 25(2), 237-256.‏
Mahinizadeh, M., Yavare, K., Valibeigi, H., & Shafiei, A. (2019). An Analysis of the Rate of Interest and Inflation in the Banking System Based on Asymmetric Information. Iranian Journal of Trade Studies, 23(92), 231-269. [In Persian].
Manzoor, D., & Taghipour, A. (2016). A Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model for an Oil-Exporting and Small Open Economy: The Case of Iran. Journal of Economic Research and Policies, 23(75), 7-44. [In Persian].
Mazher, M. A., & Dahalan, J. (2020). Existence of Debt Laffer curve in Malaysian Economy–A Cointegration VECM Analysis. Journal of the Social Sciences, 48(3).‏2892-2906.
Milani, F. (2009). Expectations, Learning, and the Changing Relationship between Oil Prices and the Macroeconomy. Energy Economics, 31(6), 827-837. [In Persian].
Mishkin, F. S. (2007). The Economics of Money, Banking, and Financial Markets. Pearson Education.‏
Montazeri Shoorekchali, J. (2022). Investigating the Effect of Government Financing Methods on Economic Growth in Iran: Markov-Switching (MS) Approach. The Journal of Economic Policy, 14(27), 113-153. [In Persian].
Morina, F., Hysa, E., Ergün, U., Panait, M., & Voica, M. C. (2020). The Effect of Exchange Rate Volatility on Economic Growth: Case of the CEE Countries. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(8), 177.‏
Nakhli, S. R., Rafat, M., Bakhshi Dastjerdi, R., & Rafei, M. (2020). A DSGE Analysis of the Effects of Economic Sanctions: Evidence from the Central Bank of Iran. Iranian Journal of Economic Studies, 9(1), 35-70.‏
Punzi, M. T. (2019). The Impact of Energy Price Uncertainty on Macroeconomic Variables. Energy Policy, 129, 1306-1319.
Ramoni-Perazzi, J., & Romero, H. (2022). Exchange Rate Volatility, Corruption, and Economic Growth. Heliyon, 8(12), 1-11.
Rotemberg, J. J. (1982). Monopolistic Price Adjustment and Aggregate Output. The Review of Economic Studies, 49(4), 517-531.
Samsami H, Ahmadloo F, & Azimi A. (2014). The Comparison of the Influence of Government Financing through Increase of Exchange rate and Borrowing from the Central Bank on Production and Inflation. Theories of Financial Economics, 2(3), 11-36. [In Persian].
Seighalani, S., Jalali-Naini, S. A., & Khiabani, N. (2022). External Shocks, Exchange Rate Changes, and Intermediate Goods: Explanation of Stagflation in Iranian Economy. Planning and Budgeting, 27(2), 3-50. [In Persian].
Keho, Y. (2021). Determinants of Trade Balance in West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU): Evidence from Heterogeneous Panel Analysis. Cogent Economics & Finance, 9(1), 1-16.‏
Komijani, A., & Tavakolian, H. (2012). Monetary Policy under Fiscal Dominance and Implicit Inflation Target in Iran: A DSGE approach.‏ Journal of Research in Economic Modeling, 3(8), 87-117. [In Persian].
Tavakolian, H., & Ghiaie, H. (2019). Optimal Inflation Targeting in a Dual-Exchange Rate Oil Economy (No. 2019-09). THEMA (THéorieEconomique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
Tavakolian, H., & JalaliNaeeni, A. (2017). Optimal and Discretionary Monetary and Exchange Policies in Iran: A DSGE Approach. Iran Economic Research, 22(70), 33-98. [In Persian].
Tavakolian, H., & Sarem, M. (2017). DSGE Models in DYNARE. Tehran, Monetary and Banking Research Institute. [In Persian].
Tlik, R., Najafzade, A., Fakhr Hosseini, F., & Sarlak, A. (2023). Utilization of Mixed Data Sampling Model in Identifying the Effects of Monthly Exchange Rate Changes on Seasonal GDP of Iran. Financial Economics, 17(62), 161-184. [In Persian].
Tuğral, A., & Bari, B. (2021). Asymmetric Effects of Exchange Rate on Inflation in Turkey: What Aggregated and Disaggregated Data Reveal. Erciyes Akademi, 35(3), 1095-1115.
Younessi, A., Ghafari, H., & Pourkazemi, M. (2016). Financial Policies and Household Utility: a Mathematical Model Approach, Quarterly Journal of Fiscal and Economic Policies, 3(12), 79-104. [In Persian].
Zhao, L., Zhang, X., Wang, S., & Xu, S., (2016). The Effects of Oil Price Shocks on Output and Inflation in China. Energy Econ, 53, 101–110.