Measuring the Energy Market Uncertainty Index and Analyzing Its Effects on Economic Growth in Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 . M.Sc. Student in Economics, Department of Economic Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

3 Ph.D. Candidate in Health Economics, Department of Economic Development and Planning, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Tarbiat Modares, Iran

10.22034/epj.2026.23674.2746

Abstract

Abstract
Economic growth is one of the most important indicators of development and welfare. For an economy such as Iran, which is faced with structural challenges and long-standing dependence on oil revenues, economic growth is of great significance. The energy sector functions as the primary engine of economic growth, playing a critical role in production, employment creation, and social welfare. Yet, uncertainty and instability within the energy sector represent one of the most pressing challenges for Iran’s economy, shaping the outlook for both growth and sustainable development. Enhancing energy security through the promotion of clean energy and the implementation of effective and forward-looking energy policies can help lay the foundation for stable, inclusive, and environmentally responsible growth. The present study seeks to estimate the degree of energy economy uncertainty and analyze its impact on Iran’s economic growth during the period 1989–2024. To quantify uncertainty, conditional GARCH models are applied and, to evaluate its influence on growth, the Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (DOLS) method is employed. The empirical results demonstrate that uncertainty in the energy economy exerts a significant and negative effect on economic growth, leading to reduced investment flows, delays in production projects, and lower productivity levels. In contrast, higher levels of investment, labor force development, and technological progress are associated with significant positive impacts on growth, expanding the country’s productive capacity. Moreover, political improvements and increased female participation in economic activity strengthen institutional stability, foster confidence among economic actors, and support labor market development, whereas geopolitical risks continue to limit growth potential.
 
Extended Abstract
 Purpose: Economic growth is widely recognized as a key determinant of national development and quality of life. In resource-dependent economies like Iran, fluctuations in energy markets, structural inefficiencies, and external shocks can significantly affect growth trajectories. The energy sector, encompassing oil, gas, and electricity production and consumption, is directly linked to industrial performance, fiscal revenues, and employment creation. Despite its centrality, the volatility of energy prices, production, and exports creates uncertainty that can adversely influence investment decisions, productivity, and overall economic stability. Understanding the role of energy market uncertainty is, therefore, essential for designing robust growth policies. This study contributes to the literature by constructing a novel Energy Market Uncertainty Index specific to Iran, which captures the combined volatility of key energy variables including crude oil production and exports, gas production and consumption, and electricity generation and use. Unlike prior research that has primarily focused on aggregate economic uncertainty or global energy markets, this study offers a localized and policy-relevant measure for Iran. In addition, the research investigates the broader determinants of growth, including capital accumulation, labor force development, technological progress, political risk, geopolitical uncertainty, and female labor force participation. The overarching goal is to provide policymakers with insights into how energy-related uncertainties interact with structural and institutional factors to shape economic outcomes.
 
Methodology: To estimate energy market uncertainty, this study employs conditional Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Hetero-skedasticity (GARCH) models, which allow for modeling volatility and capturing dynamic fluctuations at energy prices and production levels. The GARCH framework is particularly suitable for financial and commodity time series, enabling the derivation of a reliable uncertainty index from historical energy market data. To analyze the impact of energy market uncertainty on economic growth, the study applies the Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (DOLS) approach. This methodology is proper for potential endogeneity and serial correlation, providing consistent and efficient estimates of long-run relationships between energy uncertainty and GDP growth.
The empirical analysis utilizes the annual data covering the period from 1989 to 2024 and extracted from credible sources such as the World Bank, International Energy Agency, and national statistical agencies. The variables considered include gross domestic product (GDP) as the dependent variable, alongside independent variables capturing capital accumulation, labor input, total factor productivity, energy production and consumption, political risk, geopolitical risk, and female labor force participation. This comprehensive dataset allows for the assessment of both direct and indirect effects of energy market uncertainty,
 
Findings and Discussion: The empirical results indicate that energy market uncertainty has a significant negative effect on Iran’s economic growth. Periods of heightened volatility in oil prices, crude oil exports, domestic energy consumption, and electricity production correspond to declines in investment, interruptions in production projects, and reductions in overall productivity. These findings highlight the vulnerability of the Iranian economy to fluctuations in the energy sector, emphasizing a critical need for risk mitigation and stable policy frameworks.
Conversely, the results show that sustained investment in physical capital, labor force development, and technological advancement positively and significantly contributes to economic growth. These factors enhance production capacity, improve productivity, and reinforce the economy’s resilience to external shocks. Furthermore, improved political conditions and increased female labor force participation bolster institutional stability, enhance investor confidence, and expand labor market participation, all of which further support growth. Geopolitical risks, however, continue to constrain economic expansion, underscoring the importance of regional tension reduction, diversification of international relations, and strategic energy diplomacy.
 
Conclusions and Policy Implications: The findings suggest that managing energy market uncertainty is crucial for sustaining economic growth in Iran. Policy measures aimed at stabilizing energy markets, improving transparency and data availability, developing risk-hedging instruments, and coordinating energy and macroeconomic policies can mitigate adverse impacts. Diversifying the energy mix, promoting renewable energy sources, and increasing energy efficiency across industrial and residential sectors are also essential strategies to enhance economic resilience. Additionally, fostering technological innovation, investing in human capital, and encouraging greater female labor force participation can reinforce long-term growth prospects.
Overall, the study confirms the dual role of energy as both a driver of growth and a source of uncertainty in Iran’s economy. By providing a localized Energy Market Uncertainty Index and demonstrating its tangible effects on GDP growth, this research offers valuable insights for the policymakers who seek to stabilize the economy, improve investment confidence, and pursue sustainable and inclusive development. Implementing coordinated and forward-looking policies that address structural vulnerabilities and energy volatility can help Iran achieve a more predictable, resilient, and sustainable growth trajectory.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abd Alhasan Alsaedi, A. F., Salehnia, N. and Ahmadi Shadmehri, M. T. (2024). Comparing the effect of positive and negative oil price shocks on the economic growth of Iran and Iraq: evidence from the NARDL model. Economic Growth and Development Research15(57). doi: 10.30473/egdr.2024.71409.6853 [In Persian].
Arezki, R., Ramey, V. A., & Sheng, L. (2017). News shocks in open economies: Evidence from giant oil discoveries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(1), 103–155. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2015/wp15209.pdf
Assari Arani, A. and Rostami, S. (2022). The Impact of Energy Security on the Economic Growth. Economics Research22(84), 139-169. doi: 10.22054/joer.2022.67463.1057 [In Persian].
Bloom, N. (2009). The impact of uncertainty shocks. Econometrica, 77(3), 623–685. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.3982/ECTA6248
Boungou, W., Dufau, B., Fawaz, M., & Dash, D. P. (2025). Energy uncertainty index and European banks. Economics Letters, 247, 112122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2024.112122
Dang, T. H.-N., Nguyen, C. P., Lee, G. S., Nguyen, B. Q., & Le, T. T. (2023). Measuring the energy-related uncertainty index. Energy Economics, 124, 106817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106817
Davis, S. J., & Haltiwanger, J. (1992). Gross job creation, gross job destruction, and employment reallocation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 819–863. https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/107/3/819/1873525
Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987–1007. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1912773
Farzanegan, M. R., & Markwardt, G. (2009). The effects of oil price shocks on the Iranian economy. Energy economics31(1), 134-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.09.003
Fathi, S., Nonejad, M., Zare, H., & Haghighat, A. (2023). The asymmetric effects of oil price shocks and trade openness volatility on inflation and economic growth in the Islamic Conference Organization countries. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research (QEER), 19(78), 103–129. http://iiesj.ir/article-1-1491-fa.html [In Persian].
Fattahi, S., Sohaili, K., & Abdolmaleki, H. (2014). Oil price uncertainty and economic growth in Iran: Evidence from asymmetric VARMA, MVGARCH-M. Journal of Economic Modeling Research, 5(17), 57–85. http://jfm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-844-en.html [In Persian].
Gudarzi Farahani, Y., Mehrara, M., & Morsali Arzanagh, Z. (2023). The impact of electricity consumption on economic growth in terms of investment in energy infrastructure: a case study for selected developing countries. Journal of Energy Economics Modeling1(1), -. doi: 10.22080/jeem.2023.26293.1003 [In Persian].
Ha, L. T., & Thanh, T. T. (2025). Measuring dynamic interlinkages between energy uncertainty, investor sentiment and financial market volatility: Fresh insights from the R² decomposed linkage method. Energy Reports, 13, 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.11.045
Hamilton, J. D. (2009). Causes and consequences of the oil shock of 2007–08. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 40(1), 215–259. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2009a_bpea_hamilton-1.pdf
Hayat, A., & Tahir, M. (2021). Natural resources volatility and economic growth: evidence from the resource-rich region. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(2), 84.
Jurado, K., Ludvigson, S. C., & Ng, S. (2015). Measuring uncertainty. American Economic Review, 105(3), 1177–1216. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.20131193
Kallesh, K., Kumar, U. V. C., Nagesh, H. M., & Narahari, N. (2025). Topological indices, entropy measures, and graph energy prediction of porphyrazine and tetrakis porphyrazine. Results in Engineering, 28, 107448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107448
Keshavarzian, M., & Tabatabaiie Nasab, Z. (2021). Analysis of the relationship between electricity consumption and economic growth in OPEC member countries: Bootstrap panel causality test approach. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research (QEER), 17(69), 1–21. http://iiesj.ir/article-1-1377-fa.html [In Persian].
Komijani, A. and Haji Heidari. (2024). Asymmetric Effects of Oil Price Shocks, Oil Price Uncertainty and Economic Sanctions on Economic Growth and Inflation in Iran. The Journal of Economic Studies and Policies10(2), 189-218. doi: 10.22096/esp.2024.539363.1573 [In Persian].
Lan, N. T. H., & Cong, P. T. (2023). Electricity consumption and economic growth of Vietnam in 1986-2020. VNU University of Economics and Business, 3(2), 40-40.
Li, Y. (2024). Exploring the Effects of Renewable Energy Consumption and Global Uncertainty on Economic Growth: A Global Perspective.‏
Liu, Y., Yi, S., Li, S., & Chen, G. (2025). Asymmetric impacts of energy market-related uncertainty on clean energy stock volatility: The role of extreme shocks. International Review of Financial Analysis, 103, 104206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104206
Maddah, M. , Jeyhoontabar, F. and Najafi, Z. (2015). Six interpretations of Wagner’s law in Iran, as an oil-exporting country, based on econometric techniques. The Journal of Economic Policy7(13), 111-132. https://ep.yazd.ac.ir/article_555.html [In Persian].
Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437. https://eml.berkeley.edu/~dromer/papers/MRW_QJE1992.pdf
Mehrara, M. (2007). Energy consumption and economic growth: The case of oil exporting countries. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2939–2945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.018
Moshiri, S., Lechtenböhmer, S., Atabi, F., Knoop, K., Massarrat, M., Panjehshahi, M. H., ... & Supersberger, N. (2015). Sustainable energy strategy for Iran. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy. https://epub.wupperinst.org/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/6175/file/WS51.pdf
Peng, Y.-T., Chang, T., & Ranjbar, O. (2025). Analyzing the dynamics of the persistence of energy-related uncertainty of G7 countries: What does the time-varying SUR-ADF model say? Energy, 320, 135188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135188
Pindyck, R. S. (1990). Irreversibility, uncertainty, and investment. Journal of Economic Literature, 29(3), 1110–1152. https://web.mit.edu/rpindyck/www/Papers/IrreverUncertInvestmentJEL1991.pdf
Rahimi, G. A., & Ashoori, M. (2024). Investigating the effect of oil price instability on Iran's economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research (QEER), 20(83), 243–257. http://iiesj.ir/article-1-1662-fa.html [In Persian].
Riaz, A., Ullah, Z., & Hashmi, S. H. (2025). A temporal exploration of resilience of renewable energy consumption to the energy-related uncertainty shocks in the US. Journal of Cleaner Production, 493, 144946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144946
Saikkonen, P. (1991). Estimation of cointegrating vectors by linear inference methods. Econometric Theory, 7(1), 1–21. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/econometric-theory/article/estimation-of-cointegration-vectors-with-linear-restrictions/A3362F289D8CBBE7231FC352D47118DD
Stern, D. I. (2011). The role of energy in economic growth. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1219(1), 26–51. https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05921.x
Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (1993). A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica, 61(4), 783–820. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2951763
Wilson, C., Shrimali, G., & Caldecott, B. (2025). Investment in new oil & gas assets: The effect of energy-related uncertainty and climate policy. Energy Economics, 151, 108917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108917