تجزیه و تحلیل سیاست‌های پولی در شرایط عدم تعادل در اقتصاد ایران- رویکرد مدل عدم تعادل پویای تصادفی DSDE

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، ایران

2 استادیار گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم اجتماعی، گروه اقتصاد، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

3 دانشیار، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم اجتماعی، گروه اقتصاد، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

چکیده

هدف این مطالعه تجزیه و تحلیل سیاست‌های پولی در شرایط عدم تعادل در اقتصاد ایران است. در راستای تجزیه و تحلیل نتایج از روش عدم تعادل پویای تصادفی در بازه زمانی 1400-1370 بر اساس فراوانی داده‌های فصلی استفاده گردید. رویکرد مورد استفاده در این مطالعه لحاظ عدم تعادل در بازارهای اقتصادی و سرایت آن به سایر بازارها و واکنش متغیرهای کلان اقتصادی به شوک وارد شده مدل‌سازی است. عدم تعادل در مدل‌های تصادفی پویا به دلیل وجود اصطکاک‌های مالی و حقیقی در بازارها رخ می‌دهد. ابزارهای مورد استفاده در این مطالعه روش همیلتون – ژاکوبی – بلمن و همچنین انتظارات آینده‌نگر کولوموگروف به منظور حل مدل در شرایط عدم تعادلی بوده است. نتایج بدست آمده از این مطالعه بیان‌گر این بود که متغیر انحراف ارز در واکنش به شوک سیاست پولی افزایش یافته است و با تغییر در متغیر هم وضعیت،‌ عدم تعادل و انحراف در نرخ ارز در طول زمان افزایش یافته است. همچنین، مشاهده گردید که شوک سیاست پولی از طریق ایجاد عدم تعادل در قیمت‌ها منجر به انحراف در نرخ ارز شده است. واکنش مخارج مصرفی نیز به شوک سیاست پولی در طول زمان فزاینده بوده است. نتایج بدست آمده بیان‌گر این است که با وارد شدن شوک سیاست پولی از طریق متغیر هم وضعیت و عدم تعادل در بازار پول و ارز منجر به ایجاد فشار قیمتی و افزایش در مخارج مصرفی خانوارها شده است و این روند در طول دوره زمانی صعودی بوده است. متغیر انحراف تولید نیز در واکنش به شوک سیاست پولی افزایش داشته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis of monetary policies in the condition of disequilibrium in Iran's economy - DSDE- dynamic stochastic disequilibrium model approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Saeed Valinezhad 1
  • َAhmad Salah manesh 2
  • Ebrahim Anvari 3
1 PhD student in economics, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Purpose: Monetary policy rules that are used to implement monetary policies by central banks are determined in a strategic framework in order to do trade-offs between goals such as inflation, unemployment and economic growth. Economic authorities use laws as a guide to implement their policies regarding the deviation of target variables from their desired goals or levels.
The new Keynesian DSGE models in vogue in central banking have long ignored the insights of the economy information revolution to which Joseph Stiglitz made an important contribution. Furthermore, these models have not been successful in providing important research insights about alternative theories on model selection and the consequences of structural failures in the econometric literature, in which David Hendry plays a key role. By addressing the debates between the critics and advocates of New Keynesian DSGE models, Henry and Muelbauer show how evidence-based research can improve quantitative policy models and enable central banks to better understand financial stability and models.
The fundamental difference between the neoclassical and Keynesian theories lies in the understanding of the labor market. In the neoclassical case, the nominal wage is understood as an adaptive variable. In the absence of labor market imperfections such as search and matching frictions or non-equilibrium wages due to the existence of asymmetric information, nominal wage adjustment settles the labor market for a given price level. In such a situation, Keynesian unemployment caused by the lack of aggregate demand cannot exist. The economy is supply-side determined because the factor of market settlement along with the aggregate production function requires a unique level of output and employment.
Macroeconomic modeling has come under severe criticism since the Great Financial Crisis, when serious flaws in the methodology used to understand the economy as a whole became apparent. Criticisms have been directed toward the assumptions used in dominant models, especially in that economic factors are homogeneous and optimal and that the economy is in equilibrium. Some researchers seek to explore an interdisciplinary approach to macroeconomic modeling, with techniques drawn from other sciences (natural and social). In particular, they discuss agent-based modeling as an example of such a technique, which is used in a wide variety of disciplines. Agent-based models complement the existing approaches and are suitable for answering macroeconomic questions in which complexity, heterogeneity of economic agents and their expectations, networks, and discoveries play an important role. Based on the literature, this study uses a disequilibrium approach to investigate the effect of monetary policies on macroeconomic variables.
Methodology: The purpose of this paper was to analyze the monetary policies under disequilibrium in Iran's economy. In order to analyze the results, the random dynamic disequilibrium method was used in the period of 1989-2022 based on the frequency of seasonal data. The approach used in this study is modeling in terms of the disequilibrium in economic markets and its spread to other markets as well as the reaction of macroeconomic variables to the shock. Disequilibrium in dynamic stochastic models occurs due to financial and real frictions in markets. The tools used in this study were the Hamilton-Jacobi-Belman method as well as Kolomogrof's forward-looking expectations in order to solve the model in disequilibrium conditions.
Findings and Discussion: The results obtained from this study indicated that the currency deviation variable has increased in response to the monetary policy shock. Also, with the change in the same variable, this disequilibrium and deviation in the exchange rate has increased over time. It was observed that the shock of the monetary policy has led to the deviation in the exchange rate by creating disequilibrium in the prices. The response of consumer spending to monetary policy shocks has also been increasing over time. The results indicate that, with the introduction of the monetary policy shock, the situation and imbalance in the money and currency market has led to price pressure and an increase in household consumption expenditures, and this trend has been upward over time. The production deviation variable has also increased in response to the monetary policy shock.
Conclusion and Policy Implications: Guiding monetary policies and designing a structure that increases the credibility and acceptability of both applied policies and monetary policymakers, on the one hand, and the realization of the main priority of monetary policies, i.e. achieving a low and stable inflation rate and making it possible to maintain it, on the other hand, in recent years have been the focus of attention of many economists. The results indicate that, with the introduction of the monetary policy shock, the disequilibrium in the money and currency market has led to price pressure and an increase in household consumption expenditures. This trend has been upward over time. The production deviation variable has also increased in response to the monetary policy shock. According to the results obtained from this study, it is suggested that the instability and disequilibrium in Iran's economy are due to the exchange rate and balance of payments, and this imbalance is transferred to all markets through economic policies. This is the basis for the country's monetary authorities to implement their policies, especially in the field of foreign exchange, by setting a fluctuation range and anchoring the nominal exchange rate to changes in foreign exchange reserves as well as the inflation rate to prevent the spread of disequilibrium in the currency and money market as the real sector of the economy.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Monetary policy
  • Exchange rate
  • Production
  • Inflation
  • Dynamic stochastic disequilibrium (DSDE) model
Backhouse, R. & Boianovsky, M. (2012). "Conclusion. In Transforming Modern Macroeconomics: Exploring Disequilibrium Microfoundations, 1956–2003". UK, Cambridge University Press.
Boivin, J. Blinder, A. Chow, G. & Loyo, E. (2000). "The Fed’s Conduct of Monetary Policy: Has it Changed and does it Matter?” Working Paper, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, Unpublished:2-3.Available at SSRN 217430 Central Bank Statistical Reports (2022).
Chaparro Guevara, G. & Escot, L. (2021). "Monetary Policy Rules: An Approach Based on the Theory of Chaos Control". Results in Control and Optimization 4, 100038.
Davoodi, P. and Samsami, H. (2010). "Money and Banking Economics". Iran, Shahid Beheshti University. (In Persian)
Fagiolo, G. & Roventini, A. (2012). "Macroeconomic Policy in DSGE and Agent-based Models". Revue de l'OFCE 12(5): 67-116.
Fagiolo, G. & Roventini, A. (2016). "Macroeconomic Policy in DSGE and Agent-based Models Redux: New Developments and Challenges Ahead". Available at SSRN 2763735.
Gudarzi Farahani, Y. Khalili Araghi, M. & Abbasinejad, H. (2020). "Optimal Monetary Policy with Heterogeneous Agents and Its Effect on the Real Sectors of Economy in Iran". The Journal of Economic Policy 11(22): 63-97. (In Persian)
Guzman, M. & Stiglitz, J. E. (2020). "Towards A Dynamic Disequilibrium Theory with Randomness". National Bureau of Economic Research 2020(NBER Working Paper No. 27453).
Haldane, A. G. & Turrell, A. E. (2018). "An Interdisciplinary Model for Macroeconomics". Oxford Review of Economic Policy 34(1-2): 219-251.
Hendry, D. F. & Muellbauer, J. N. (2018). "The Future of Macroeconomics: Macro Theory and Models at the Bank of England". Oxford Review of Economic Policy 34(1-2): 287-328.
Jalali Naeini, S. M. R. and Nadarian, M. (2016). "Monetary and Currency Policy in an Oil Exporting Economy: Case of Iran". Monetary Research 9: 327-372. (In Persian)
Juselius, K. (2021). "Disequilibrium Macroeconometrics". Industrial and Corporate Change 30(2): 357-376.
Kanour, R. Alavi Rad, A. Akbari Moghadam, B. & Mirzapour Babajan, A. (2020). "The Rule of Optimal Monetary Policy based on Heterogeneity of Expectations of Economic Agents in the Form of Agent based Model". The Journal of Economic Policy 11(22): 1-32. (In Persian)
Khiabani, N. and Amiri, H. (2014). "Iran's Monetary and Financial Policy, Emphasizing the Oil Sector using DSGE Models". Economic Research 14(54): 173-173. (In Persian)
Khosrowsarkhi, M. J. Najarzadeh, R. & Heidari, H. (2022). "Optimal Monetary Policy and the DSGE System in the form of a DSGE Model Commensurate with the Oil Economy (Iran's Case)". Iran's Journal of Applied Economic Studies 11(42): 9-46. (In Persian)
Komijani, A. & Alavi, S. M. (2000). "The Efficiency of Monetary Policy on the Effectiveness of Inflation and Economic Growth in Iran". Management Futurization 12(44 and 45): 109-135. (In Persian)
Loayza, N. & Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (2002). "Monetary Policy Functions and Transmission Mechanisms: An Overview". Serieson Central Banking, Analysis, and Economic Policies No. 4.
Mashhadizadeh, F. Pirai, Kh. Akbari Moghaddam, B. & Zare, H. (2018). "Monetary Policy and Exchange Rate Grade in Iran". Journal of Iranian Applied Economic Studies 8(30): 25-55. (In Persian)
McKibbin, W. J. & Stoeckel, A. (2018). "Modelling a Complex World: Improving Macro-Models". Oxford Review of Economic Policy 34(1-2): 329-347.
Nofersti, M. (2005). "Investigating the Impact of Monetary and Currency Policies on the Iranian Economy in the Framework of a Dynamic Macro -Economics Model". Journal of Economic Research 40(3):1-29. (In Persian)
Olajide, O. O. & Temidayo, A. (2022). "Further Insights on Monetary Transmission Mechanism in Nigeria". Journal of Economics and International Finance 14(2): 11-22.
Olamide, E. Ogujiuba, K. & Maredza, A. (2022). "Exchange Rate Volatility, Inflation and Economic Growth in Developing Countries: Panel Data Approach for SADC". Economies 10(3): 67.
Salah Manesh, A. (2002). "Evaluation of Economic Policy in the form of a Macro -Imbalance Model, Doctoral Dissertation". Shahid Behsti University. (In Persian)
Sana, S. Malik, S. & Sheikh, M. R. (2022). "Investigating the Effectiveness of Channels of Monetary Transmission Mechanism in Pakistan: An Application of Var Model, Impulse Response Function and Variance Decomposition". Bulletin of Business and Economics 11(2): 160-184.
Schoder, C. (2017). "Are Dynamic Stochastic Disequilibrium Models Keynesian or Neoclassical?". Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 40: 46-63.
Schoder, C. (2020). "A Keynesian Dynamic Stochastic Disequilibrium Model for Business Cycle Analysis". Economic Modelling 86: 117-132.
Spulbar, C. & Birau, R. (2023). "Monetary Policy Transmission Mechanism in Romania over the Period 2001 to 2012: A BVAR Analysis". Research Anthology on Macroeconomics and the Achievement of Global Stability, USA, Information Resources Management Association (IRMA). DOI:10.4018/978-1-6684-7460-0.ch043.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2020). "The Pandemic Economic Crisis, Precautionary Behavior, and Mobility Constraints: An Application of the Dynamic Disequilibrium Model with Randomness". National Bureau of Economic Research 2020(NBER Working Paper No. 27992). DOI 10.3386/w27992.
Storm, S. (2021). "Cordon of Conformity: Why DSGE Models Are Not the Future of Macroeconomics". International Journal of Political Economy 50(2): 77-98.
Tavaklian, H. & Afzali Abraqoui, W. (2016). "Comparison of Macroeconomic Performance and Various Currency Regimes with Approach (DSGE)". Economic Journal 16(61): 125-181. (In Persian)
Tavaklian, H. & Jalali Naeini, A. R. (2018). "Monetary and Foreign Currency Policymaking and Optimized in a Dynamic Random Public Balance Pattern for the Iranian Economy". Economic Research of Iran 22(70): 33-98. (In Persian)
Zahabi, M. Bazazan, F. Afshari, Z. & Bostani, R. (2018). "Calculating the Optimal Monetary Policy Rule with Current Accounts and Exchange Rate Fluctuations (Bayesi's Approach)". Journal of Economic Policy Research 1(2): 1-5. (In Persian)