نقش نوآوری زیست محیطی، توسعه مالی و ریسک مالی بر انرژی‌های‌ تجدیدپذیر در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه علوم اقتصادی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران.

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد اقتصاد نظری، گروه علوم اقتصادی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران

3 پسادکتری گروه علوم اقتصادی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران.

چکیده

توسعه و استفاده از انرژی‌های تجدیدپذیر در جهت مقابله با تغییرات اقلیمی، گرمایش زمین، کاهش فشارهای محیطی و تضمین امنیت انرژی در اقتصادهای درحال توسعه از جمله ایران ضروری است. ازاین رو تحلیل عوامل مؤثر بر مصرف انرژی‌های تجدیدپذیر دارای اهمیت است. در مطالعات قبلی نقش توسعه مالی، ریسک مالی و نوآوری زیست محیطی بر مصرف انرژی‌های تجدیدپذیر کمتر مورد توجه واقع شده است. بنابراین هدف این پژوهش بررسی اثر مستقل و تعاملی توسعه مالی، ریسک مالی و نوآوری زیست محیطی بر انرژی‌های تجدیدپذیر در ایران با استفاده از روش حداقل مربعات معمولی پویا (DOLS) طی دوره زمانی (2022 - 1990) است. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که متغیرهای نوآوری زیست محیطی و توسعه مالی اثر مثبت و ریسک مالی اثر منفی بر مصرف انرژی‌های تجدیدپذیر دارند. از طرفی، توسعه مالی و ریسک مالی به ترتیب باعث تقویت و تضعیف اثر نوآوری زیست محیطی بر مصرف انرژی‌های تجدیدپذیر شده است. سایر نتایج نشان می‌دهد که رشد اقتصادی و باز بودن تجاری اثر افزایشی و انتشار گازهای گلخانه‌ای اثر کاهشی بر مصرف انرژی‌های تجدیدپذیر دارند. بر اساس نتایج پژوهش، پیشنهاد می‌شود که با کاهش ریسک و بهبود منابع مالی در جهت افزایش نوآوری‌های زیست محیطی، سهم استفاده از انرژی‌های تجدیدپذیر در کشور افزایش پیدا کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Role of Environmental Innovation, Financial Development and Financial Risk on Renewable Energy in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Bakhtiar Javaheri 1
  • Vahid Azizi 2
  • Salaheddin Manochehri 3
1 Associate Professor, Department of Economic Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
2 M.A. Student of Economics, Department of Economic Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
3 Postdoctoral in Economics, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Purpose: Energy plays a crucial role in the progress of societies, as a necessary component towards achieving economic development and prosperity. Energy sources can be categorized into renewable and non-renewable ones. As the world encounters crises of environmental pollution, and climate change leading to long-term negative effects on ecosystems and global economy, there is an increasing focus on renewable and clean energy sources. In response to these challenges, many countries are working to enhance the proportion of renewable energy in their environmental cycles. In this regard, Iran has been identified as one of the economies confronting high pollution in the region; therefore, it is essential to investigate the factors influencing the consumption of clean energy in this country. This research aims to study the independent effects and the interactive roles of environmental innovation, financial development, and financial risks on the consumption of renewable energy in Iran. The findings of the research can provide valuable insights for policymakers and planners, assisting them in formulating and implementing effective financial, energy, and environmental policies as the main purpose of these policies is to enhance sustainable economic growth and stability while addressing environmental challenges.
Methodology: In order to conduct the research based on the objectives of the study, our experimental model is specified and tested in the form of following four equations.
In equations 1 to 4, the dependent variable is REC (Renewable Energy Consumption), representing the percentage of total final energy consumption attributed to renewable sources. The main independent variables are:

EI (Environmental Innovation), measured by the number of the patents recorded in the environment field
FD (Financial Development), reflecting the level of financial development
FR (Financial Risk), indicating the degree of financial risk

The above independent variables also include their interaction variables.
Additionally, the control variables are:

EG (Economic Growth), represented by the GDP per capita in 2015 constant price in US dollars
EP (Environmental Pollution), measured by the total greenhouse gas emissions in kilotons of CO2 equivalent
TO (Trade Openness), representing trade as a percentage of GDP

The data for REC, EG, TO, and EP are sourced from the World Bank. The variable EI is obtained from the database of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). FR is sourced from Political Risk Services (PRS). The variable FD is extracted from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Empirical research models were analyzed using time series data to cover the years 1990 to 2022. The Dynamic Ordinary Least Square (DOLS) method was employed for the analysis, allowing for a comprehensive testing of the relationships among the variables over the specified time period.
Findings and Discussion: The stationary of variables, assessed by the Augmented Dickey-Fuller test (ADF), indicates that REC, TO, EG, FD, and FR variables are stationary in order one I(1), while EP and EI variables are stationary I(0). This suggests that cointegration relationship of the data is of orders I(0) and I(1). The optimal lag was determined using the Bayesian Information Criterion (SBC); it is lag one. The Johansen-Juselius Cointegration Test was employed to examine the existence of long-term relationships among the research variables. The results confirm at least one long-term relationship among the research variables in various model specifications. In the first model, the FD variable is positive and statistically significant (P = .01). A one-unit increase in FD corresponds to a 2.92 unit increase in the REC variable. In the second model, the FR index is positive and statistically significant (P = 0.1). A one-unit decrease in FR leads to a 0.5-unit increase in the REC variable. For model 3, the interactive variable of EI and FD is statistically significant (P = .01). A one unit increase in this interactive variable results in a 0.82-unit increase in REC. In model 4, the interactive variable of EI and FR is significant (P = .01) with a positive sign, indicating that a one-unit increase in this interactive variable leads to a 0.07-unit increase in REC. The results also show that the parameter of EG is significant at the 5% probability level. A one percent increase in EG corresponds to REC increases of 1.62, 2.24, 3.42, and 2.38 units for models 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. The EP variable has a negative effect on REC (P = .01). A one percent increase in EP results in REC increases of 2.44, 3.58, 3.16, and 3.08 units for models 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. The TO variable, with a positive sign, is significant at the 1% probability level. A one-unit increase in TO corresponds to REC increases of 0.03, 0.03, 0.02 and 0.02 units for models 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. The DOLS method was employed to estimate the research models.
Conclusions and Policy Implications: The results indicate that the EI (Environmental Innovation) variable has a positive impact on REC (Renewable Energy Consumption). The application and development of technology plays a crucial role, empowering investors to enhance energy efficiency and environmental quality through the implementation of new innovations in production and the expansion of clean energy development infrastructure. Furthermore, the findings demonstrate that FD (Financial Development) has a positive effect, while financial risk (FR) has a negative effect on REC. In addition, the simultaneous combined impact of FD, FR, and EI on REC is significant and positive effects. The results suggest that, in countries like Iran, where the share of renewable energy consumption is smaller, improvements in financial indicators and encouragement of environmental innovations have a more noticeable effect on strengthening the development of the renewable energy industry. The study also highlights that FD amplifies the effect, while FR lessens the effect of EI on the REC variable. This implies that, in countries with a smaller share of renewable energy consumption, the influence of enhancing financial development combined with environmental innovations on the development of the renewable energy sector is more considerable. The results suggest that technological innovation is a potential solution to boost the consumption and development of renewable energy, particularly in the field of improved financial development. A developed financial system, as indicated by the study, provides various financing methods and risk management tools for companies and households, facilitating access to funds with reduced financial risks. Moreover, innovative technology can enhance the production and distribution of renewable energies and raise the standard level of manufacturing industries. In conclusion, creating conditions to improve the productivity of innovative technologies in production with minimal pollution and expansion the combination of renewable energy and technological innovation are the approaches suggested in this study. This dual strategy can mitigate environmental damage while promoting sustainable energy consumption and development.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Financial Development
  • Financial Risk
  • Environmental Innovation
  • Renewable Energy
  • Iran
Abbasinejad, H., & Goudarzi Farahani, Y. (2013). Applied Econometrics with Eviews and Microfit. Tehran: Noor Elam. [In Persian].
Aghaei, M., Rezagholizadeh, M., & Abdi, Y. (2019). Financial Development and Renewable Energy Technology Development in Different Sectors: Application of Panel Tobit Model. Journal of Economic Research, 54(2), 253-284. doi: 10.22059/jte.2019.71284. [In Persian].
Aghaei, M., Rezagholizadeh, M., & Hosseini, M. (2018). Financial Stability, Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Environmental Quality: Fresh Evidences of Iran. Macroeconomics Research Letter, 13(26), 171-199. doi: 10.22080/iejm.2018.2232. [In Persian].
Ali, W., Abdullah, A., & Azam, M. (2017). Re-visiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis for Malaysia: Fresh Evidence from ARDL Bounds Testing Approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77, 990-1000. Doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.236.
Al-Mulali, U., & Sab, C. N. B. C. (2012). The Impact of Energy Consumption and CO2 Emission on the Economic Growth and Financial Development in the Sub-Saharan African Countries. Energy, 39(1), 180-186. Doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.032.
Asadi, A., Esmaeili, M., Bakhshor, F., & Sadeghpor, A. (2019). Investigation of Factors Affecting Energy Consumption in Iran (With Emphasis on Financial Development Variable). Quarterly Journal of Fiscal and Economic Policies, 7(25), 151-177. [In Persian].
Azizi, V., Mehregan, N., & Yavari, G. (2016). Effects of Trade Liberalization on the Trade Balance in Agriculture of Iran. Agricultural Economics and Development, 23(4), 141-168. doi: 10.30490/aead.2016.59016. [In Persian].
Behboudi, D., Mohammadzadeh, P., & Moosavi, S. (2020). Investigation of Interrelationship between Renewable Energy- Sustainable Development- Co2 Emissions in Iran: Bayesian VAR Approach. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22(2), 395-407. doi: 10.22034/jest.2020.27377.3646. [In Persian].
Bhattacharyya, S. C. (2019). Energy Economics: Concepts, Issues, Markets and Governance. Springer Nature.
Brunnschweiler, C. N. (2010). Finance for Renewable Energy: An Empirical Analysis of Developing and Transition Economies. Environment and Development Economics, 15(3), 241-274. Doi: 10.1017/S1355770X1000001X.
Du, K., Li, P., & Yan, Z. (2019). Do Green Technology Innovations Contribute to Carbon Dioxide Emission Reduction? Empirical Evidence from Patent Data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 297-303. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.010.
Fotors, M. H., Moridiyan Pirdoosti, A., & Nematollahi, F. (2021). Investigating the Impact of Financial Development and Economic Growth on Energy Demand in Iran's Economy, Asymmetric Causality Approach. Stable Economy Journal, 1(1), 79-106. doi: 10.22111/sedj.2021.35352.1102. [In Persian].
Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O'Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable Development: Mapping Different Approaches. Sustainable Development, 13(1), 38-52. Doi: 10.1002/sd.244.
Hu, H., Xie, N., Fang, D., & Zhang, X. (2018). The Role of Renewable Energy Consumption and Commercial Services Trade in Carbon Dioxide Reduction: Evidence from 25 Developing Countries. Applied Energy, 211, 1229-1244. Doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.019.
ICRG (2024). The International Country Risk Guide (ICRG). Available at: https://www.prsgroup.com/explore-our-products/icrg.
International Monetary Fund (2024). About Financial Development Index. Available at: https://data.imf.org/?sk=f8032e80-b36c-43b1-ac26-493c5b1cd33b&sid=1480712464593.
Khan, A., Chenggang, Y., Hussain, J., & Kui, Z. (2021). Impact of Technological Innovation, Financial Development and Foreign Direct Investment on Renewable Energy, Non-Renewable Energy and the Environment in Belt & Road Initiative Countries. Renewable Energy, 171, 479-491. Doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.075.
Liao, S. H., Fei, W. C., & Liu, C. T. (2008). Relationships between Knowledge Inertia, Organizational Learning and Organization Innovation. Technovation, 28(4), 183-195. Doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.11.005.
Lin, B., Omoju, O. E., & Okonkwo, J. U. (2016). Factors Influencing Renewable Electricity Consumption in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 687-696. Doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.003.
Luo, Y. (2023). Does ICT Development Influence Renewable Energy Investment? Evidence from Top-Polluted Economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 428, 139271. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139271.
Maradana, R. P., Pradhan, R. P., Dash, S., Gaurav, K., Jayakumar, M., & Chatterjee, D. (2017). Does Innovation Promote Economic Growth? Evidence from European Countries. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 6(1), 1-23. Doi: 10.1186/s13731-016-0061-9.
Meirun, T., Mihardjo, L. W., Haseeb, M., Khan, S. A. R., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2021). The Dynamics Effect of Green Technology Innovation on Economic Growth and CO 2 Emission in Singapore: New Evidence from Bootstrap ARDL Approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 4184-4194. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10760-w.
Memarzadeh, A., Mahmoudinia, D. & Jedavi, M. (2021). Investigating the Effect of Financial Development and Economic Growth on Renewable Energy Consumption in Iran, M.sc Thesis, Vali-E-Asr University of Rafsanjan. [In Persian].
Mirzapour Sharamin, M. & Atrkar Roshan, S. (2020). The Impact of Renewable Energy and Technological Innovation on CO2 Emissions, M.sc Thesis, Al-Zahra University. [In Persian].
Naeimi, F., Jahantigh, Y., & Varahrami, V. (2023). Investigating Relationship between Finance and Energy Consumption in Iran (With Emphasis on Industrialization and Urbanization). Urban Economics and Planning, 4(2), 52-64. doi: 10.22034/uep.2023.394773.1356. [In Persian].
Noferesti, M. (2012). Unit Root and Cointegration in Econometrics. (Vol. 4). Tehran: Rasa Cultural Service Institute. [In Persian].
OECD (2024). Patents on Environment Technologies (Indicator). doi: 10.1787/fff120f8-en (Accessed on 29 February 2024).
Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20(3), 597-625.
Pio, J. G. (2020). Effects of Innovation and Social Capital on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence for the Brazilian Case. International Journal of Innovation, 8(1), 40-58. DOI:10.5585/iii.v8i1.303.
Qamruzzaman, M., & Jianguo, W. (2020). The Asymmetric Relationship between Financial Development, Trade Openness, Foreign Capital Flows, and Renewable Energy Consumption: Fresh Evidence from Panel NARDL Investigation. Renewable Energy, 159, 827-842. Doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.069.
Rajapathirana, R. J., & Hui, Y. (2018). Relationship between Innovation Capability, Innovation Type, and Firm Performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(1), 44-55. Doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2017.06.002.
Saadaoui, H., & Omri, E. (2023). Towards a Gradual Transition to Renewable Energies in Tunisia: Do Foreign Direct Investments and Information and Communication Technologies Matter?. Energy Nexus, 12, 100252. Doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.130686.
Saikkonen, P. (1992). Estimation and Testing of Cointegrated Systems by an Autoregressive Approximation. Econometric Theory, 8(1), 1-27.
Shahbaz, M., Nasir, M. A., & Roubaud, D. (2018). Environmental Degradation in France: the Effects of FDI, Financial Development, and Energy Innovations. Energy Economics, 74, 843-857. Doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.020.
Shahbazi, K., Jafarzadeh, H., & Hasanzadeh, K. (2023). Investigating the Effect of Asymmetric Shocks of the Shadow Economy on Energy Consumption in Terms of Financial Development in Iran. Quarterly Energy Economics Review, 19(76), 57-86. [In Persian].
Shamohammadi Sechaki, E., Khanzadi, A., & Karimi, M. S. (2022). Investigating Factors Affecting Renewable Energy Consumption in Selected OPEC Oil Countries, A Panel ARDL Approach. Economic Policies and Research, 1(3), 80-106. doi:10.34785/J025.2022.023. [In Persian].
Solaymani, S. (2021). Impacts of Technological Innovation, Economic Growth, Global Oil Price and Trade Openness on Energy Consumption in Iran. The Economic Research, 21(2), 181-211. DOR: 20.1001.1.17356768.1400.21.2.4.4. [In Persian].
Stock, J.H. & Watson, M.W. (1993). A Simple Estimator of Cointegrating Vectors in Higher Order Integrated Systems. Econometrica, 61(4), 783- 820. DOI: 10.2307/2951763.
Su, C. W., Umar, M., & Khan, Z. (2021). Does Fiscal Decentralization and Eco-Innovation Promote Renewable Energy Consumption? Analyzing the Role of Political Risk. Science of the Total Environment, 751, 142220. Doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142220.
Töbelmann, D., & Wendler, T. (2020). The Impact of Environmental Innovation on Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118787. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118787.
Wang, Q., & Dong, Z. (2022). Technological Innovation and Renewable Energy Consumption: A Middle Path for Trading off Financial Risk and Carbon Emissions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(22), 33046-33062. Doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17915-3.
Wang, Q., Hu, S., Ge, Y., & Li, R. (2023). Impact of Eco-Innovation and Financial Efficiency on Renewable Energy–Evidence from OECD Countries. Renewable Energy, 217, 119232. Doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119232/
Wei, D., & Wu, H. (2023). Impact of Financial Development on the Development of the Renewable Energy Industry of China. Journal of Climate Finance, 5, 100023. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclimf.2023.100023.
Wei, D., Ahmad, F., Abid, N., & Khan, I. (2023). The Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on the Growth of the Renewable Energy Industry: Theoretical and Logical Chinese Experience. Journal of Cleaner Production, 428, 139357. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139357.
Wu, Y. (2010). Innovation and Economic Growth in China. Economics Discussion Papers, 10(10). University of Western Australia, Business School.
Wusiman, N., & Ndzembanteh, A. N. (2020). The Impact of Human Capital and Innovation Output on Economic Growth: Comparative Analysis of Malaysia and Turkey. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(1), 231-242. Doi: /10.18506/anemon.521583.
Zaidi, S.A.H., Zafar, M.W., Shahbaz, M., and Hou, F. (2019). Dynamic Linkages between Globalization, Financial Development and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 533-543. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.210.
Zare, L., & Hadian, E. (2021). Identification and Prioritization of Obstacles to the Development of Renewable Energy in Iran, M.sc Thesis, University of Shiraz. [In Persian].
Zhang, W., & Chiu, Y. B. (2020). Do Country Risks Influence Carbon Dioxide Emissions? A Non-Linear Perspective. Energy, 206, 118048. Doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118048.
Zhao, J., Shahbaz, M., Dong, X., & Dong, K. (2021). How Does Financial Risk Affect Global CO2 Emissions? The Role of Technological Innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 168, 120751. Doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120751.
Zheng, M., & Wong, C. Y. (2024). The Impact of Digital Economy on Renewable Energy Development in China. Innovation and Green Development, 3(1), 100094. Doi: 10.1016/j.igd.2023.100094