مقایسه اثر سیاست پولی و مالی بر رشد و تورم در رژیم های ارزی اقتصاد ایران با رویکرد تعادل عمومی پویای تصادفی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری علوم اقتصادی، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار گروه علوم اقتصادی، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

3 استادیارگروه علوم اقتصادی، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

4 دکترای اقتصاد، سازمان برنامه و بودجه، تهران، ایران

چکیده

این مقاله با استفاده از یک مدل تعادل عمومی پویای تصادفی اقتصاد باز به مقایسه اثر سیاست های پولی و مالی بر رشد و تولید در رژیم های ارزی اقتصادایران پرداخته است. وجه تمایز این مطالعه با سایر مطالعات انجام شده آن است که رژیم های ارزی برمبنای واقعیت اقتصاد ایران به سه دوره تفکیک شده اند.در دوره اول رژیم ارزی کشورچند نرخی ارز بود در دوره دوم رژیم شناور مدیریت و در دوره سوم و با تشدید تحریم ها مجدداً رژیم چند نرخی بر کشور حاکم شد. نتایج نشان می دهد اثر سیاست مالی انبساطی بر تولید در رژیم های چند نرخی مثبت و در رژیم شناور مدیریت شده منفی است. همچنین اثر مثبت شوک مخارج دولت بر تورم در رژیم چند نرخی دوره اول بیشتر از دوره سوم است. نتایج نشان می دهد اتخاذ سیاست پولی انبساطی در دوره اول اثر مثبتی بر تولید داشته و اثر آن در دوره دوم و سوم منفی است. تورم نیز در هر سه دوره افزایش یافته است. همچنین اجرای سیاست مالی و پولی در رژیم شناور مدیریت شده کمترین زیان رفاهی را ایجاد خواهد نمود. لذا با توجه الزام قانونی مقام پولی به اجرای رژیم ارزی شناور مدیریت شده پیشنهاد می‌شود پیش‌نیازهای اجرای آن به منظور عملکرد مناسب‌تر آن مد نظر قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

comparing the effect of monetary and financial policy in the currency regimes of Iran's economy on growth and inflation with the stochastic dynamic general equilibrium approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Roya Atefimanesh 1
  • Morteza Tahamipour Zarandi 2
  • Hossein Samsami 3
  • Anoushirvan Taghipour 4
1 PhD student in Faculty of Economics and Political Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Economic Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Political Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor Faculty of Economics and Political Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
4 PhD in Economics, Planning and Budget Organization, , Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Purpose: Macroeconomics policies places great importance on sustainable economic growth and price stability, and achieving these goals relies heavily on effective financial and monetary policies. Researchers have conducted experimental studies to determine the most suitable combination of these policies to influence key economic variables, particularly growth and inflation. The impact of monetary and financial policies on production and inflation is influenced by various factors, including currency regimes.
Several studies have explored the relationship between financial and monetary policies and economic growth while considering the currency regime. Gali (2007 and 2015), Navid Jameel et al. (2023), and Biabani et al. (2021) are noteworthy examples of such studies. Furthermore, the effects of monetary and financial policies on inflation can vary significantly depending on the currency regime and other factors. Walugo et al. (2023) examined this issue in Ghana, analyzing the inflation targeting framework of the country's monetary policies. The results indicated that the effectiveness of monetary and financial policies was greatly influenced by the currency regime and exchange rate in Ghana.
Despite numerous foreign studies on the effectiveness of monetary and financial policies in different currency regimes, empirical studies in Iran's economy have not investigated or compared the effects of these policies under different currency regimes. This article aims to fill that gap by examining the impact of monetary and fiscal policies within the context of the currency regimes experienced in Iran's economy. Iran's economy is characterized as a small, open economy heavily reliant on oil revenues. The analysis will be conducted using a Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) framework.
Metodology: This article employs a Stochastic dynamic general equilibrium model within the framework of a small open economy to analyze the impact of economic sanctions on the Iranian economy. The analysis is based on the principles of New Keynesian economics and assumes the presence of price and wage stickiness. The study focuses on the decision-making process of the household sector, which optimizes choices related to consumption, labor supply, and money demand. Additionally, separate specifications are made for the new Phillips Kinesin curve, capturing both domestic and imported inflation.
Given the dominant role of the financial sector and the limited independence of the central bank, the study combines the government budget with the central bank's balance sheet. The monetary and currency policy is modeled through two channels: foreign assets and the volume of liquidity. In Iran, where interest rates are controlled, the study replaces the interest rate targeting policy with the growth rate of liquidity as a key instrument of monetary policy. The model incorporates two policy instruments: intervention in the currency market and adjustments to the money growth rate.
The study divides the currency regimes experienced in Iran into three periods. The first period covers the years 1368-1380, characterized by a multiple exchange rate regime. Although multiple authorized and official rates were present during this period, it resembles a fixed regime to some extent. The second period spans the years 1381-1390, during which a floating currency regime was implemented. The third period encompasses the years 1391-1401 and resembles the first period in terms of a multi-rate regime. However, compared to the first period, this regime exhibits greater exchange rate fluctuations and a reduced variety of rates, making it more flexible.
Findings and Discussion: he interpretation of the instantaneous reaction graphs reveals several key findings. Firstly, expansionary fiscal policy has a positive effect on production in multi-rate regimes, but a negative effect in managed floating regimes. Moreover, the positive impact of government expenditure shocks on inflation is greater in the multi-rate regime of the first period compared to the third period. This finding aligns with Mandel-Fleming's studies, which suggest that financial policies are more effective under a fixed currency regime. In such a regime, to prevent the strengthening of the national currency, monetary policy needs to be expanded, thereby reinforcing the initial effects of fiscal expansion on spending.
Regarding monetary policy, the results indicate a positive effect on production in the fixed currency regime, but a negative effect in the second and third periods when the currency regime is managed floating or multi-rate (close to floating). These outcomes suggest that the increase in liquidity in recent years has been predominantly absorbed by non-productive activities, resulting in a lack of real impact of monetary policy on production growth. Interestingly, monetary policy has led to increased inflation in all three periods.
Additionally, the study findings demonstrate that the managed floating currency regime incurs the least welfare loss in response to monetary and financial policy shocks.
Conclusions and Policy Implications: Based on the study's findings, it is evident that the managed floating currency regime results in the least welfare losses when facing monetary and financial policy shocks. Iran has identified itself as a country adopting a managed floating exchange rate regime within its development program. However, the implementation of this currency regime has only been possible for a limited period. Therefore, it is recommended that the prerequisites for an effective performance of this currency regime be considered, including inflation targeting, independence of the central bank, and adherence to an appropriate range of exchange rate fluctuations. These measures align with the legal requirements of the monetary authority in implementing a managed floating currency regime.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • : monetary policy
  • Fiscal policy
  • Multi- Exchange Rate Regime
  • Managed Floating Exchange Rate Regime
  • Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model
Abbasi, F., Pedram, M., & Taqipour, A. (2020). Modeling the Currency Market Pressure in the Monetary Policy of the Iranian Economy with the Stochastic Dynamic General Equilibrium Approach. Journal of Economic Research and Policies, 28(96) 163-218. (In Persian)
Adolfson, M., Lasen, S., Lind, J., & Villani, M. (2007). Bayesian Estimation of an Open Economy Dsge Model with Incomplete Pass-through, Journal of International Economics, 72(2), 481-511.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.938699
Al-Abri, A. (2014). Optimal Exchange Rate Policy for a Small Oil-Exporting Country: A Dynamic General Equilibrium Perspective, Economic Modeling, 36(3), 88-98.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.976605
Atefi Mansh, R. (2014). The Extent of Pegged Currency Regimes in the World, Examining its Benefits and Harms with an Emphasis on Oil Exporting Countries, Financial and Economic Policy Quarterly, 2(5), 21-40. (In Persian)
Atefi Mansh, R. (2015). Exchange Rate Regimes in the Member Countries of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, Financial and Economic Policy Quarterly, 3(10), 5-32. (In Persian)
Bahrami, J., & Qarayeshi, N. (2011). Analysis of Monetary Policy in Iran's Economy with the Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Approach, Economic Modeling, 32(1), 1-22. (In Persian)
Batini, N., Gabriel, V., Levine, P., & Pearlman, J. (2010). A Floating Versus Managed Exchange Rate Regime in a DSGE Model of India, Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(3), 728-752.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734580.013.0029
Berger, W. (2006). The Choice between Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates: Which is Best for a Small Open Economy?, Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, 28(4), 371-385.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.03.005
Badinger, H. (2009). Globalization, the Output–Inflation Tradeoff and Inflation, European Economic Review, 53(2), 888–907.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.03.005
Bleanery, M., & Manuel, F. (2007). Exchange Rate Regimes in Developing Countries. The B.E Journal Macroeconomic, 12(7), 7-25.
https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1690.1546
Brito, R., & Bystedt, B. (2010). Inflation Targeting in Emerging Economies: Panel Evidence, Journal of Development Economics, 91(3), 198–210.
Brooks, S. P., & Gelman, A. (1998). General Methods for Monitoring Convergence of Iterative Simulations, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7(4), 434-455.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1390675
Calderón, C., & Schmidt Hebbel, K. (2008). Choosing an Exchange Rate Regime, Central Bank of Chile, Working Papers, 494.
Cevik, S., & Miryugin, F. (2023). Its Never Different: Fiscal Policy Shocks And Inflation, International Monatery Fund, Working Paper 98.
Cevik, S., & Zhu, T. (2020). Trinity Strikes Back: Monetary Independence and Inflation In The Caribbean, Journal of International Development, 37, 375-380.
Christiano, L. J., Eichenbaum, M., & Evans, C. L. )2005(. Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effect of a Shook to Monetary Policy. Journal of Political Economy, 113, 1-45.
Davis, S., & Fujiwara, I. (2015). Pegging the Exchange Rate to Gain Monetary Policy Credibility. Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute. Working Paper, 224.  
De Gravwe, P., & Guntther, S. (2008). Exchange Rate Stability, Inflation and Growthin South-Eastern and Central Europe. Review of Development Economies, 12(3), 530- 549.
Devereux, M. B., & Engel, C. (2002). Exchange Rate Pass-Through, Exchange Rate Volatility, and Exchange Rate Disconnect. Journal of Monetary Economics, 10(3), 913-940.
Devereux, M., Lan, Ph., & Xu, J. (2005). Exchange Rates and Monetary Policy in Emerging Market. Economies the Economic Journal, 116(511), 478-506.
Devereux, M. B., & Yetman, J. (2005). Price Adjustment and Exchange Rate Pass-Through. Mimeo, SSRN Electronic Journal.
Dornbusch, R. (2001). Fewer Monies, Better Monies, Working Paper 8324. https://doi.org/10.3386/w8324
Dornbusch, R. (1980). Open Economy Macroeconomics, Working Paper 2375. https://doi.org/10.3386/w2372
Fakieh, R. (2013). Inflation and Exchange Rate Policies in Saudi Arabia, World Population Policies, United Nations, 446-447. https://doi.org/10.18356/119ed494-en
Friedman, M. (1953). The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates, Further Essays in Monetary Economics, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203482155-17
Fleming, J. M. (1962). Domestic Financial Policies under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates, IMF Staff Papers, 3.
Frankel, J., Fajnzylber, E., Schmukler, S. L., & Servén, L., (2001). Verifying Exchange Rate Regimes. Journal of Development Economics, 66(10): 351–86.
Gali, J., & Monacelli, T. (2005). Optimal Monetary and Fiscal Policy in a Currency Union, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Gali, J. (2007). Monetary Policy ,Inflation and the Business Cycle: An Introduction to the New Keynesian Framework, National Bureau of Economic Research (2007)
Gruben, W., & McLeod, D. (2002). Capital Account Liberalization and Inflation. Economic Letters, 77(2), 221–225
Gurkaynak, R., Kisacikoglu, B., & Seek, l. S. (2022). Exchange Rate Inflation Under Weak Monetary Policy: Turkey Verifies Theory, SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4110158
Hausmann, R., Panizza, U., & Stein, E.H. (2000). Why Do Countries Float the Way They Float?, Working Paper, 418.
https://doi.org/10.18235/0010778
Krugman, P., Obstfeld, M., & Melitz, M.J. (2010). International Economics: Theory and Policy, Pearson University, Addison Wesley 9th Edition.
Ghosh, A.R., Gulde, A.M., & Wolf, H,. (2002). Exchange Rate Regimes: Choices and Consequences, London, MIT Press Direct. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2898.001.0001
Kydland, F. E. & Prescott, V. (1982). Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations, Econometrica, 50(6), 1345-1370.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1913386
Mahmoudzadeh, M., & Sadeghi, S. (2016). Choosing the Optimal Currency System for Iran's Economy, DSGE Approach. Economic Research, 52(1), 132-162. (In Persian)
Manzoor, D., & Taqipour, A. (2015). Formulation of a Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) Model for a Small Open Oil Exporting Economy; Subject of Study: Iran. Economic Research and Policy Quarterly, 23(75), 44-7. (In Persian)
Mundell, R. A. (1963). Capital Mobility and Stabilization Policy under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates, Canadian J of Economics and Political Science, 29(4): 475-485.
https://doi.org/10.2307/139336
Naveed Jamil, R., Adnan, M,. Abdul, M., & Zeeshan, M. (2023). Cross-culture -culture Study the Macro Variables and Its Impact on Exchange Rate Regims, Future Business Journal, Springer, 9(1), 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00189-1
Nurkse, R. (1945). International Currency Experience: Lessons of the Inter-war Period, International Affairs, Oxford University Press 21(3), 398-3999.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3018825
Obstfeld, M., & Roggoff, K. (1996). Foundations of International Macroeconomics. Southern Economic Journal, 64(1), 337-350.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1061063
Obstfeld, M., Shambaugh, J.C,. & Taylor, A. M. (2005). The Trilemma in History: Tradeoffs among Exchange Rates, Monetary Policies, and Capital Mobility. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(3), 423 -440.
https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653054638300
Rajaei, H. A., Jalali Esfandabadi, A. & Zayendehroodi, M. (2021). Examining the Impact of Exchange Rate Fluctuations on the Output Gap and Inflation in the Iranian Economy Using a Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) Model. published in the Economic Strategy Research Quarterly, 9(35), 263-292. (In Persian)
Samarina, A., Terpstra, M., & De Haan, J. (2014). Inflation Targeting and Inflation Performance: A Comparative Analysis. Applied Economics, 46(10), 41–56.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2013.829205
Shambaugh, J. (2004). The Effects of Fixed Exchange Rates on Monetary Policy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119. 301–352.
Smets, F., & Wouters, R. (2003). Monetary Policy in an Estimated Stochastic Dynamic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 1123–1175.
Solvi Tabar, Sh., & Jelali Nayini, A. (2014). Evaluation of Different Currency Regimes in a Small Open Economy. Planning and Budget. 12(2), 3-23. (In Persian)
Setser, B. (2007). The Case for Exchange Rate Flexibility in Oil- exporting Economies, Policy Brief, Peterson Institute for International Economics, PB07-8.
Tavakolian, H., & Afzali Abarghooyie, V. (2016). Comparing Macroeconomic Performance and Different Exchange Rate Regimes using a DSGE Approach. Journal of Economic Research, 16(61), 81-125. (In Persian)
Valogo, M., Kwabena, D.E., Yusif, H,. & Baidoo, S. T. (2023). Effect of Exchange Rate on Inflation in the Inflation Target Framework: Is the Threshold Level Relevant?. Research in Globalization, 6(21), 100-119.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2023.100119
Wang, Y., Wang, Xin., Zhang, Z., Cui, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Role of Fiscal and Monetary Policies for Economic Recovery in China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 17(21), 51-63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.10.011
Yagci, F. (2001). Choice of Exchange Rate Regimes for Developing Countries, Africa Region Working Paper, 16.
Zhang, Z., & Wang, S. (2022). Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words? Assessing the Effects of Inflation Targeting Track Records on Macroeconomic Performance, IMF Working Paper, 22/227. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400224287.001