بررسی اثر نامتقارن نااطمینانی سیاست‌های اقتصادی داخلی و جهانی بر شاخص کل بازار سهام ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار اقتصاد، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد،گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکترای تخصصی،گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

چکیده

این مطالعه تأثیر نااطمینانی سیاست‌های اقتصادی داخلی (EPU) و جهانی (GEPU) بر شاخص کل بازار سهام ایران را در بازه‌های کوتاه‌مدت و بلندمدت بررسی می‌کند. برای این منظور، از داده‌های فصلی 1390 تا 1402 و مدل NARDL استفاده شده است. شاخص EPU با بهره‌گیری از متغیرهای سیاستی (مخارج دولت، مالیات، نقدینگی، نرخ ارز) و روش‌های فیلتر کالمن بسط‌یافته (EKF) و تحلیل مؤلفه‌های اصلی (PCA) محاسبه شده است. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که چه در کوتاه‌مدت و چه بلندمدت، شوک‌های مثبت و منفی EPU تأثیر منفی، معنادار و متقارنی بر شاخص سهام دارند. همچنین اثر شوک‌های GEPU بر شاخص بازار سهام در کوتاه‌مدت نامتقارن بوده و شوک‌های مثبت GEPU در کوتاه‌مدت ابتدا اثری مثبت و سپس اثر منفی دارند، در حالی که شوک‌های منفی آن اثر مثبت ایجاد می‌کنند. با این حال، بر اساس نتایج به دست آمده شوک‌های GEPU در بلندمدت تأثیر معناداری بر شاخص بازار سهام ندارد. علاوه بر این، نتایج نشان می‌دهد که شاخص قیمت مصرف‌کننده و بحران کووید-19 نیز در بلندمدت اثر مثبت و معناداری بر شاخص بازار سهام داشته‌اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Exploring the Asymmetric Impact of Domestic and Global Economic Policy Uncertainty on the Stock Market Index in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sakineh Sojoodi 1
  • Parisa Yousefi 2
  • Elmira Azizi Norouzabadi 3
1 Associate Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
2 Master's Student, Department of Economics, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
3 PhD Student, Department of Economics, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Purpose: The stock market plays a critical role in economic growth and development by channeling savings into productive investments. For emerging economies like Iran, stock market stability is essential to reduce dependence on oil revenues and achieve economic diversification. However, Iran's stock market is highly sensitive to fluctuations in economic policy uncertainty (EPU), both domestically and globally. Domestic uncertainties often stem from unpredictable government policies, inflation volatility, and fiscal deficits, while global uncertainties relate to international trade disputes, geopolitical risks, and macroeconomic instability in major economies. The asymmetric nature of these uncertainties means that their positive and negative shocks can impact the stock market differently.
This study investigates these asymmetric impacts of domestic EPU and global economic policy uncertainty (GEPU) on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE) index. Unlike linear approaches, this research adopts a nonlinear perspective, recognizing that financial markets often react disproportionately to policy shocks. Understanding these dynamics is crucial in a country like Iran, where economic policy inconsistencies and external sanctions frequently disrupt financial markets. The research addresses the key gaps in the literature by exploring short- and long-term asymmetries in the relationship between EPU, GEPU, and stock market performance in Iran.
Methodology: To explore the asymmetric impact of policy uncertainty, this study uses quarterly data spanning from 2011 to 2023. Two primary indices, EPU and GEPU, are constructed using advanced statistical techniques as follows:
Extended Kalman Filtering (EKF): This technique extracts time-varying economic uncertainty from government spending, taxation, and exchange rate data.
Principal Component Analysis (PCA): This technique aggregates multiple macroeconomic variables to create robust composite indices for both EPU and GEPU.
The Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) model is employed to capture asymmetries. This model is particularly useful in disentangling the short-term and long-term impacts of positive and negative shocks on the stock market. Unlike traditional models, the NARDL framework accounts for the fact that financial markets may react differently to increases and decreases in uncertainty. Additional variables such as inflation, gold prices, and the COVID-19 pandemic are included to control for their influences on market dynamics.
The methodological rigor of this study lies in its ability to combine advanced econometric modeling with real-world relevance. By isolating the asymmetric effects of policy uncertainty, it provides a nuanced understanding of the factors driving stock market performance in Iran.
Findings and Discussion: Asymmetric effects of domestic EPU: The findings reveal that positive shocks to domestic policy uncertainty have a significantly negative impact on the stock market in both short and long terms. Investors respond to heightened uncertainty by withdrawing investments or reallocating them to safer assets, leading to market declines. Negative shocks, however, have a weaker influence, suggesting that reduced uncertainty does not immediately restore the investor confidence. This highlights the persistent nature of market skepticism in Iran, driven by a history of abrupt policy changes and economic mismanagement.
Impact of GEPU on Iran’s stock market: Global policy uncertainty has a limited but noticeable effect on the stock market. Positive shocks to GEPU negatively affect the stock market index in the short term as investors anticipate reduced trade flows, currency depreciation, and heightened risk premiums. However, the long-term effects are muted, reflecting Iran's limited integration into global financial markets due to sanctions and trade restrictions. Negative shocks to GEPU indicate reduced global uncertainty and, thus, have an insignificant impact, reinforcing the dominance of domestic factors in shaping Iran's stock market performance.
Role of inflation and gold prices: Inflation positively correlates with nominal stock market growth, primarily due to asset hedging behaviors in inflationary environments. Gold prices, on the other hand, do not show significant interactions with the stock market; they challenge conventional wisdom about the role of gold as a safe haven. This finding underscores the inefficiencies and speculative nature of Iran's financial markets.
COVID-19 pandemic as a case study: Contrary to expectations, the COVID-19 pandemic had a short-term positive impact on the stock market. Government interventions, including liquidity injections and fiscal support, stabilized investor sentiment during the crisis. This highlights the importance of timely and targeted policy responses in mitigating the adverse effects of uncertainty shocks.
Conclusions and Policy Implications: This research underscores the critical role of domestic policy uncertainty in influencing Iran's stock market. While global uncertainties have a secondary effect, the findings suggest that policymakers must prioritize the reduction of domestic EPU to enhance market stability and investor confidence. The key conclusions and policy recommendations are itemized below:
Reducing domestic policy uncertainty: Transparent communication of fiscal and monetary policies is essential for mitigating uncertainty. Policymakers should adopt predictable and consistent strategies to stabilize investor expectations and reduce the adverse effects of policy shocks.
Strengthening financial institutions: Enhancing the transparency and governance of financial markets can attract long-term investments and reduce speculative behaviors. Regulatory reforms should focus on improving market efficiency and protecting investor rights.
Gradual global integration: Iran's limited exposure to global financial markets shields it from some external shocks. It also restricts opportunities for diversification and resilience. Gradual reintegration into global trade and financial systems can help to mitigate domestic vulnerabilities and create new growth avenues.
Leveraging crisis management lessons: The positive impact of COVID-19 interventions demonstrates the importance of proactive policy measures during economic crises. Establishing contingency plans and improving policy coordination can enhance the government’s ability to manage future uncertainties.
This study has broader implications for developing economies facing similar challenges. The asymmetric effects of policy uncertainty observed in Iran may apply to other countries with volatile political environments, limited financial infrastructure, and heavy dependence on domestic markets. The findings emphasize the need for a stable environment to foster economic growth and resilience in emerging markets.
This research contributes to the literature by highlighting the nonlinear and asymmetric nature of the impacts of policy uncertainty on stock markets. By focusing on Iran, a country with unique economic and political characteristics, it fills a critical gap in understanding the interplay between policy uncertainty and financial markets in emerging economies.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Domestic and Global Economic Policy Uncertainty
  • Stock Market Index
  • NARDL
  • Extended Kalman Filter
  • Principal Component Analysis
Alaee, R., Salahmanesh, A., & Arman, S. A. (2019). Determining the Optimal Economic Uncertainty Index for Iran's Economy. Economic Strategy Quarterly, 28, 111–145 (In Persian).
Amiri, H., & Pirdadeh Biranvand, M. (2019). Economic Policy Uncertainty and the Iranian Stock Market: A Markov Regime-Switching Approach. Financial Knowledge of Securities Analysis, 44, 49–67 (In Persian).
Arbab, H., Amadeh, H., & Amini, A. (2021). The Impact of Economic Policy Uncertainty on the Performance of Petrochemical Companies under Different Market Conditions. Iranian Economic Research, 88, 191–221 (In Persian).
Ashena, M. and La’l Khezri, H. (2020). The Dynamic Correlation of Global Economic Policy Uncertainty Index with Stock, Exchange Rate and Gold Markets in Iran: Application of M-GARRCH and DCC Approach. Journal of Econometric Modelling, 5(2), 147-172. (In Persian).
Aydin, M., Pata, U. K., & Inal, V. (2022). Economic Policy Uncertainty and Stock Prices in BRIC Countries: Evidence from Asymmetric Frequency Domain Causality Approach. Applied Economic Analysis, 30(89), 114-129.
Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636.
Baur, D. G., & Lucey, B. M. (2010). Is Gold a Hedge or a Safe Haven? An Analysis of Stocks, Bonds and Gold. The Financial Review, 45(2), 217–229.
Bird, R., & Yeung, D. (2012). How Do Investors React Under Uncertainty? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 20(2), 310-327.
Bloom, N. (2014). Fluctuations in Uncertainty. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 153-176.
Brogaard, J., & Detzel, A. (2015). The Asset-Pricing Implications of Government Economic Policy Uncertainty. Management Science, 61(1), 3–18.
Chen, G. (Ed.). (1993). Approximate Kalman Filtering (Vol. 2). World Scientific.
Choi, S., & Yoon, C. (2022). Uncertainty, Financial Markets, and Monetary Policy over the Last Century. The BE Journal of Macroeconomics, 22(2), 397–434.
Chui, C. K. & Chen, G. (1991). Kalman Filtering with Real-Time Applications. Springer Verlag.
Davis, S. J. (2016). An Index of Global Economic Policy Uncertainty (No. w22740). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Erdoğan, L., Ceylan, R., & Abdul-Rahman, M. (2022). The Impact of Domestic and Global Risk Factors on Turkish Stock Market: Evidence from the NARDL Approach. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(7), 1961–1974.
Fotourechi, Z., Farhang, A. A., & Mohammadpour, A. (2022). The Effect of Economic Policy Uncertainty on Renewable Energy Consumption: A Pooled Mean Group Panel Approach. Industrial Economics, 20, 41–57 (In Persian).
Ghani, M., & Ahmad, S. (2023). Economic Policy Uncertainty and Emerging Stock Market Volatility. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 59(5), 1234–1250.
Hoque, E., Zaidi, M., & Ahmed, S. (2019). The Impact of Global Economic Policy Uncertainty on Stock Market Returns in a Regime-Switching Environment: Evidence from Sectoral Perspectives. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(4), 991–1016.
Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal Component Analysis. Springer.
Khezri, M., Safavi, B., & Hedayatpour, D. (2022). The Impact of Economic Instability on Iran's Stock Market with an Emphasis on the EPU Index of Economic Policy Uncertainty. Journal of Economics and Business, 25, 49–67 (In Persian).
Li, R., Tang, G., Hong, C., Li, S., Li, B., & Xiang, S. (2024). A Study on Economic Policy Uncertainty, Geopolitical Risk and Stock Market Spillovers in BRICS Countries. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 73, 102134.
Li, T., Ma, F., Zhang, X., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Economic Policy Uncertainty and the Chinese Stock Market Volatility: Novel Evidence. Economic Modelling, 87, 24-33.
Liang, C. C., Troy, C., & Rouyer, E. (2020). US Uncertainty and Asian Stock Prices: Evidence from the Asymmetric NARDL Model. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 51, 101046.
Nusair, S. A., & Al-Khasawneh, J. A. (2023). Changes in Oil Price and Economic Policy Uncertainty and the G7 Stock Returns: Evidence from Asymmetric Quantile Regression Analysis. Economic Change and Restructuring, 56(3), 1849–1893.
Ozbek, L., & Ozlale, U. (2005). Employing the Extended Kalman Filter in Measuring the Output Gap. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 29(9), 1611-1622.
Pahlavan, S., Najafi Moghaddam, A., Emam-Verdi, G., & Darabi, R. (2022). The Impact of Financial, Economic, Political, and International Risks on the Tehran Stock Exchange Index Using the ARDL Method. Investment Studies, 11(41), 303–332 (In Persian).
Parashar, N., Sharma, R., Sandhya, S., & Joshi, A. (2024). Market Volatility vs. Economic Growth: The Role of Cognitive Bias. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(11), 479.
Pástor, Ľ., & Veronesi, P. (2013). Political Uncertainty and Risk Premia. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(3), 520-545.
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
Phan, D. H. B., & Narayan, P. K. (2020). Country Responses and the Reaction of the Stock Market to COVID-19: A Preliminary Exposition. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(10), 2138–2150.
Phan, D. H. B., & Narayan, P. K. (2021). Country Responses and the Reaction of the Stock Market to COVID-19—A Preliminary Exposition. In Research on Pandemics (pp. 6-18). Routledge.
Phan, T. C., Rieger, M. O., & Wang, M. (2018). What Leads to Overtrading and Under-Diversification? Survey Evidence from Retail Investors in an Emerging Market. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 19, 39-55.
Racicot, F. É., & Théoret, R. (2010). Forecasting Stochastic Volatility Using the Kalman Filter: An Application to Canadian Interest Rates and Price-Earnings Ratio. Aestimatio: The IEB International Journal of Finance, (1), 28-47.
Raheem, I. D. (2017). Asymmetry and Break Effects of Oil Price-Macroeconomic Fundamentals Dynamics: The Trade Effect Channel. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 16, 12-25.
Shaikh, I., & Vallabh, P. (2024). Impact of Policy Uncertainty on Gold Price in India: Evidence from Multi Commodity Exchange (MCX) India and World Gold Council Prices. Applied Economics, 56(32), 3837-3855.
Simran, & Sharma, A. K. (2024). Asymmetric Nexus between Economic Policy Uncertainty and the Indian Stock Market: Evidence Using NARDL Approach. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 93, 91-101.
Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling Asymmetric Cointegration and Dynamic Multipliers in a Nonlinear ARDL Framework. Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt: Econometric Methods and Applications, 281–314.
Svec, J., & Katrak, X. (2017). Forecasting Volatility with Interacting Multiple Models. Finance Research Letters, 20, 245-252.
Williams, C. D. (2009). Asymmetric Responses to Earnings News: A Case for Ambiguity (Doctoral Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill).
Younis, I., Gupta, H., Shah, W. U., Sharif, A., & Tang, X. (2024). The Effects of Economic Uncertainty and Trade Policy Uncertainty on Industry-Specific Stock Markets Equity. Computational Economics, 64(5), 2909-2933.
Yu, H., Fang, L., & Sun, W. (2018). Forecasting Performance of Global Economic Policy Uncertainty for Volatility of Chinese Stock Market. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 505, 931-940.